Recognize recurring markets
Create a distinct farmers-market category for organized, recurring outdoor or semi-indoor marketplaces built around producer-direct agricultural products, locally produced foods, plants and regional handcrafted goods.
Surf City Farmers Market brought neighbors together and supported dozens of local businesses. We are asking Surf City for a fair, practical way for it to return.
At the October 15 work session, Town staff said the current temporary-use ordinance has no clear permit for a recurring weekly market. The proposed amendment is being reviewed for the November 12 Planning Board meeting, with Council consideration expected in December. The market is still paused.
At the October 15, 2026 Town Council work session, Community Development Director Jeremy Smith explained that Surf City currently has permits for certain one-time temporary events, but no clear permitting route for a weekly, recurring farmers market. Council requested a discussion of how the existing rules could be updated.
Staff described the submitted amendment as a potential way to allow an annual permit for a designated market location and recurring day. Council and staff discussed site suitability, parking, emergency access, property-owner permission, insurance, health and safety, and the number of market days allowed. Smith also said the proposed 25% agricultural-vendor minimum could be difficult to enforce and that he would work with the applicant on clearer language. Smith also explained that Town-sponsored events are separately exempted from the temporary-use permit category; Council members emphasized the importance of basic safety standards regardless. These were points for drafting and review, not rules Council adopted.
During public comment, Andrew thanked Councilman Andy Pleil for his response to the petition and for helping bring the issue forward. Andrew again asked for a temporary option to operate while the amendment moves through review, and for a more productive conversation about the concerns affecting the market. No interim authorization was announced at the meeting.
Smith said staff intended to bring the revised proposal to the November 12 Planning Board meeting at 4:00 p.m. and expected Council consideration in December, subject to the review process. The October 15 discussion is documented in the public meeting recording; approved October 15 minutes are not yet posted. The dates are staff's anticipated schedule, not a guarantee of approval or a final hearing notice.
Current status: the market is paused. Draft language is being reviewed; no temporary exemption, recurring-market permit, or ordinance amendment has been approved.
My name is Nona Phelps. I own Eat My Feelings, organize the Surf City Farmers Market, and am a wife and mom of four. I started this market because local small businesses need real opportunities to meet their neighbors, and because Surf City deserves a welcoming Friday-evening gathering.
Depending on the week, approximately 20 to 50 local businesses participate or are represented. Some vendors travel more than 50 miles, bringing their own customers into town to visit other businesses and the brewery.
On September 17, my husband Andrew spoke during public comment while I was working at the Hampstead Farmers Market. The Town's approved minutes record his account of the immediate impact on our family, the participating vendors, our charitable work and the petition. The minutes say the Town Manager asked the Community Development Director to get Andrew information for follow-up.
I attended a September 22 follow-up with Community Development Director Jeremy Smith expecting a conversation about the rules and alternatives. Instead, I was directed to file the proposed change in the Town's system. I did so that day and paid the required filing fee. No interim exception was offered to keep the market running during the review.
At the October 15 work session, Andrew thanked Councilman Andy Pleil for helping bring the issue before Council, but asked again for a temporary path to operate and a meaningful opportunity to address the Town's concerns while the amendment is reviewed.
I appreciate Council considering the issue publicly. What we need next is a workable result that treats community markets consistently and transparently.
From my perspective, approaching the venue and property owner without first speaking with me felt unfair. Because the Town also operates a farmers market, I have concerns about how the rules have been applied. These are my concerns, not proven legal conclusions. I am preparing a public-records request to clarify who was involved, what was discussed and whether alternatives were considered.
— Nona



On September 22, I submitted zoning text amendment TA-26-3 to distinguish recurring, producer-focused farmers markets from flea markets, swap meets and short-term merchant tent sales. The three pages below show my original submitted proposal, not a final draft or an adopted ordinance.
At the October 15 work session, staff said they would work with me on revised language before bringing it to the Planning Board. In particular, the proposed 25% agricultural-vendor threshold was discussed as a potential enforcement difficulty. The final wording may change.
Create a distinct farmers-market category for organized, recurring outdoor or semi-indoor marketplaces built around producer-direct agricultural products, locally produced foods, plants and regional handcrafted goods.
Permit farmers markets in the proposed C-1, C-2 and Mixed Use commercial districts and allow special-use consideration in the specified civic/institutional districts.
As originally submitted: an annual permit, one market day per week per location, hours between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., a proposed 25% food/agricultural-vendor minimum, parking, six-foot walkways, emergency access, sanitation and sign standards. Staff flagged the 25% threshold for possible revision. None of these proposed requirements has been adopted.
Three pages from Nona's proposed amendment are shown here for transparency. These are not approved ordinance changes.
The Town has relied on existing zoning provisions addressing unlisted land uses and temporary outdoor sales. We believe recurring farmers markets deserve a distinct, practical framework with clear safety, parking and vendor standards.
Because the Town also operates its own market, it is important to us that any rules are applied consistently. Nona's concern about the sequence of contacts and the resulting disruption is her perspective, not a finding of wrongdoing. A factual public record can clarify the questions that remain unresolved.
We will continue providing relevant meeting agendas, approved minutes, original documents and decision notices as they become available.
Our organizer records indicate Surf City Farmers Market was established before the Town's current Shop the Sound Craft & Farmers Market series. A Town market organizer later approached Eat My Feelings about participating without initially realizing I organized the private market.
Surf City has cited provisions covering land uses not otherwise listed and limits on certain temporary outdoor sales. Those sections are why I filed language to define a recurring, producer-focused farmers market as its own use.
According to my account and the brewery's, Town representatives raised zoning concerns directly with Surf City Brewing Company. No one first came to me as the organizer with a direct explanation or proposed alternative.
The brewery subsequently reported pressure involving the property owner and ended the market earlier than planned. It remains unconfirmed who contacted the property owner, exactly what was said and whether alternatives were explored.
The Town's approved minutes document Andrew's public comments about the vendors, our family, charitable efforts, the petition and a fair path forward. I was working at another market that evening.
According to our account, Mayor Batts asked for a meeting with Community Development staff. The official minutes say the Town Manager asked the Community Development Director to provide Andrew follow-up information. I attended the September 22 meeting with Jeremy Smith.
I expected a discussion about the ordinance, proposed changes and possible temporary options. Instead I was directed to submit written language through the Town's planning portal. There was no substantive discussion of my proposal at that meeting.
I submitted my proposed farmers-market text amendment that day. The filing cost $309.96, comprising the $300 application fee and $9.96 processing charge. It is a proposal, not an adopted rule.
I remain disappointed that an interim route to operate was not offered while the proposal moves through review. This could have helped vendors, charitable partners and our family reduce the disruption.
Andy Pleil published a Change.org decision-maker response explaining that he asked Council to discuss whether the temporary-use permitting process needs an update.
During public comment, Andrew thanked Councilman Andy Pleil for helping bring the subject to the work session, renewed our request for interim permission and asked for more productive conversations about the issues.
Jeremy Smith described the current one-off temporary-use permit structure, a possible annual site permit for a weekly farmers market, and concerns about insurance, property-owner sign-off, safety, parking and enforcing the proposed 25% agricultural-vendor standard.
Smith said staff expected to work with the applicant and present revised language at the November 12 Planning Board meeting at 4:00 p.m., followed by possible Town Council consideration in December. No permit or amendment was approved.
StarNews published a report on the paused market and possible zoning changes, also distributed through AOL, bringing the issue to additional readers.
The Town lists November 12 as the next regular Planning Board meeting. Staff said it planned to bring the farmers-market amendment to this meeting; residents should confirm the posted agenda and whether the matter is formally listed.
If the draft proceeds through Planning Board review, staff expects to bring it before Town Council in December. The Council may adopt, amend, return, postpone or reject proposed language; there is no final decision yet.
Surf City Elementary publicly thanked the Surf City Farmers Market on September 17 for organizing a supply drive for its Kindergarten Team. A September 25 charitable market benefiting a local dog rescue was also planned. When it could not proceed, several thousand dollars in donations had to be refunded.
This impacts more than a single organizer: vendors, customers, the hosting venue, local families, charities and neighboring businesses all lose a weekly opportunity to come together.

The school recognized the kindergarten supply drive organized by the Surf City Farmers Market. Community efforts like this are worth protecting.
Read the school's original post ↗









Organizer analytics captured from Change.org showed that 68% of supporters came from ZIP codes 28443, 28445 and 28411, covering Surf City, Hampstead, Holly Ridge and nearby Wilmington. Other supporters were from communities including Burgaw, Jacksonville and the Camp Lejeune area.
A signature is not proof that its signer attends the market, but the geographic picture shows meaningful nearby support. Similar market-and-hospitality models also operate in neighboring communities; their local zoning circumstances may differ.
Hampstead: Shaka Taco / Ironclad Golf & Beer Garden lists farmers markets on Thursdays. Venue information ↗
Sneads Ferry: Topsail Island Brewing has hosted the Topsail Island Local Vendor Market. Regional events calendar ↗
Different jurisdictions may have different permitting rules.
At the October 15 work session, Town staff said the farmers-market text amendment was scheduled for the November 12 Planning Board meeting at 4:00 p.m., with Town Council review anticipated in December 2026. The Planning Board meets at the Surf City Municipal Complex, 214 W. Florence Way in Hampstead. Please check the posted agenda closer to the meeting; the amendment is not yet confirmed as a published agenda item or public hearing.
The next step is for Town staff and the applicant to review proposed language, including any permit conditions and the concerns raised by Council about safety, insurance, parking, frequency and the original agricultural-vendor threshold. We still seek a lawful interim option while this process continues.
Neighbors who support a fair solution are encouraged to follow the Town's public meeting process and attend respectfully. If a community Facebook event is published, we will add the link here.
Surf City Planning Board at the Municipal Complex, 214 W. Florence Way, Hampstead. Staff said it plans to bring the amendment forward; check the official agenda before attending. The amendment remains under review, with Council consideration anticipated in December.
On October 26, the StarNews reported on the farmers market being put on hold while Surf City considers zoning changes. The report has also been distributed via AOL. We appreciate the attention this issue is receiving and encourage readers to follow the public record.
Every contribution made directly to this effort is reserved for future Town filing fees, amendment applications and the paperwork needed to pursue a lawful path forward. The September 22 filing cost $309.96: a $300 application fee and a $9.96 online processing charge. We deeply appreciate every donation, petition signature, message and offer of support.
For now, the most valuable thing you can do is sign and share the petition, follow the Town's public process, and respectfully ask for a fair solution for recurring community markets.
Original documents and links support the dates and public claims above. First-person recollections are identified as Nona's account.